hoernschen/dendrite
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/hoernschen/dendrite.git synced 2025-07-31 13:22:46 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Fix linter issues (#2624)

Browse source 
* Try that again

* All hail the mighty linter?

* And once again

* goimport all the things
This commit is contained in:
Till 2022-08-05 11:12:41 +02:00 • committed by GitHub
parent de78eab63a
commit 1b7f84250a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
20 changed files with 136 additions and 105 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

20
syncapi/internal/keychange_test.go
View file

@ -6,12 +6,13 @@ import (
"sort"
"testing"
"github.com/matrix-org/gomatrixserverlib"
"github.com/matrix-org/util"
keyapi "github.com/matrix-org/dendrite/keyserver/api"
"github.com/matrix-org/dendrite/roomserver/api"
"github.com/matrix-org/dendrite/syncapi/types"
userapi "github.com/matrix-org/dendrite/userapi/api"
"github.com/matrix-org/gomatrixserverlib"
"github.com/matrix-org/util"
)
var (
@ -364,13 +365,14 @@ func TestKeyChangeCatchupChangeAndLeft(t *testing.T) {
// tests that joining/leaving the SAME room puts users in `left` if the final state is leave.
// NB: Consider the case:
// - Alice and Bob are in a room.
// - Alice goes offline, Charlie joins, sends encrypted messages then leaves the room.
// - Alice comes back online. Technically nothing has changed in the set of users between those two points in time,
// it's still just (Alice,Bob) but then we won't be tracking Charlie -- is this okay though? It's device keys
// which are only relevant when actively sending events I think? And if Alice does need the keys she knows
// charlie's (user_id, device_id) so can just hit /keys/query - no need to keep updated about it because she
// doesn't share any rooms with him.
// - Alice and Bob are in a room.
// - Alice goes offline, Charlie joins, sends encrypted messages then leaves the room.
// - Alice comes back online. Technically nothing has changed in the set of users between those two points in time,
// it's still just (Alice,Bob) but then we won't be tracking Charlie -- is this okay though? It's device keys
// which are only relevant when actively sending events I think? And if Alice does need the keys she knows
// charlie's (user_id, device_id) so can just hit /keys/query - no need to keep updated about it because she
// doesn't share any rooms with him.
//
// Ergo, we put them in `left` as it is simpler.
func TestKeyChangeCatchupChangeAndLeftSameRoom(t *testing.T) {
newShareUser := "@berta:localhost"